Who is RESPONSIBLE? ??
everyday, so sad to read, who is responsible?
junaid last edited by
aiwaan mai baithay jageer daar aur wadairay.
beenai last edited by
Govt as well as all we trust as leaders . are responsible for the heights of disappointment and the state of depression we are in .
sasherwani last edited by
The father of the two kids is responsible! I can understand him losing faith in the government, but what justifies his loss of faith in his god and himself? Those two girls did not deserve to die. Maybe the girls wouldve grown up to be stronger beings than their loser screwed up father.
sweettruth last edited by
obsolete system of Govt only rich and influential people can sit in parliaments
lack of employment
poor leadership neither zardai nor Sharif can offer any solution
poor taxation system; rich do not pay taxes and no one can catch them
I found so many people who are responsible, so thanks God we are not responsible for this.
hussain-farooqui last edited by
All classes of our society like politicians, mullahs, lawyers, educationists,etc. have corrupt. There is no leadership in any field of life to hold the society.
sweettruth last edited by
Jump in suicide rate is alarming in our society and even I knew a guy who was cousin of my neighbours; he also committed suicide. This is not frist time and wont be last time either.
semirza last edited by
Artificial price hike created by mill owners and industrialists themselves (who double up as MPAs/MNAs), to an extent that even meager means for sustenance/survival are beyond the reach of a common man in Pakistan.
haroonyahya last edited by
Corruption in Pakistan
Please provide information about the key sectors affected by corruption in Pakistan, recent initiatives to tackle it, and local institutions and people involved in anti-corruption work. Please also provide any recent corruption diagnostic or survey material available on Pakistan.
Purpose: To prepare for a forthcoming visit to Pakistan.
The query has been answered in three main parts.
Part I provides information as to what are some of the key sectors considered to be most affected by corruption in Pakistan and lists recent survey and diagnostic work.
Part II discusses reform initiatives in a) some of the sectors listed in Part I and b) other sectors.
Part III provides annotated references to further important resources and lists contacts of a number of international and national organisations active in the field.
During the course of the research for this query, a number of resources have been examined at length, including Pakistan's National Anti-corruption Strategy document, the Draft National Integrity System County Study report, as well as resources compiled at Pakistan's government's websites and those of international multilateral agencies. In addition, the following experts have been consulted: Jeremy Carver, Jeremy Pope, Shahzadi Beg (all three are UK based experts with experience in certain areas of anti-corruption reforms in Pakistan) and Shaukat Omari (head of TI Pakistan). The answer thus combines elements endorsed from the consulted resources and experts along with research and analytical input by the Helpdesk researcher. The Helpdesk will be happy to further elaborate on any aspect of the query.
Part I: Key sectors affected by corruption in Pakistan and recent diagnostic material
To fully respond to the question as to which sectors are most affected by corruption, both quantitative (through diagnostic material) and qualitative (through reports and direct questioning of international and national experts) sources have been consulted. Nevertheless, it is worth bearing in mind that some of the reasons that particular sectors are highlighted more often than others are due not only to objective merits but also to the facts that i) there is more research and survey work done in those areas and ii) public perception and awareness seem to be more vocal as regards those areas. Thus, the exercise of highlighting some of the sectors should be read with the knowledge that corruption in Pakistan seems pervasive across most sectors. With that in mind, it is safe to say that expert sources indicate that the following sectors are among those most affected by corruption (the particular order varies from source to source):
Police and law enforcement
Judiciary and legal profession
Tax and customs
Health and education
In addition, Public Procurement seems to be a major concern across most sectors
Examples of reform initiatives in some of these sectors are provided in Part II (see below).
These sectors seem to be affected by chains of:
petty corruption to access public services or to bypass the law (through the direct interaction of citizens with the respective authorities and bribe-paying)
middle and grand corruption (through corruption in public contracting and procurement as well as direct misappropriation of public funds by senior officials).
in addition, political patronage, conflicts of interest, influence peddling and other forms of corrupt behaviour are commonplace across the sectors.
Diagnostic and survey tools conducted in Pakistan include:
Baseline Survey/Social Audit of Governance and Service Delivery, by CIET International and NRB (National Reconstruction Bureau), conducted in 2001-2002 (published in 2003)
The social audit was commissioned by the NRB and supported financially by CIDA, UNDP and UNESCO. Set up as a means of monitoring the effects of the devolution of powers to local government levels on delivery of public services and governance, this baseline survey (piloted in ten districts in 2001 and implemented in the rest in 2002) included more than 50,000 household interviews covering all of Pakistan's districts. Respondents gave their views and experience of health, education, water, judiciary and police services, local government and others. According to CIET, the results of this baseline survey (published in October 2003) have been shared widely with policy makers, service providers and communities and are to be used as benchmarks. The social audit will be repeated annually, both monitoring the impact of devolution and allowing policies to be adapted according to evidence of what works and where.
The full report can be downloaded as a PDF file at the following address: http://www.balochistan.org.pk/pdf/Pak2002baseline.pdf
Alternatively, the U4 helpdesk will be happy to email a copy.
Corruption in South Asia: Insights and Benchmarks from Citizen Feedback Surveys in Five Countries, 2002
A household survey released by TI in December 2002, reported high levels of corruption in public institutions in South Asia. Of the seven major public institutions, the police emerged as the most corrupt in all five countries surveyed (Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka). The judiciary was identified as the second most corrupt area in all countries except Pakistan, where land administration and the tax authorities were identified as the second and third most corrupt areas respectively. Land administration figures prominently in the list of the most corrupt sectors in four out of the five countries. The TI report identifies high levels of corruption encountered by citizens attempting to access seven basic public services.
The report can be downloaded here (please scroll down to the bottom of the page)
Pakistan Corruption Report, 2002 (this report was the basis for the regional one listed above)
The survey was conducted by Marketing and Research consultants under the auspices of TI Pakistan. The general objective of the survey was to measure the nature and extent of corruption being faced by consumers of seven public sector departments (Education, Health, Power, Land Administration, Taxation, Police, Judiciary). Another objective of the survey was to gather information about the particular stages where obstacles are usually being faced, locate the responsible element for creating the obstacles and the means for overcoming the bottlenecks in the seven sectors under study.
Download the report here (zip-file with word documents)
Part II: Reform Initiatives
At the heart of Pakistan's recent anti-corruption drive are country's National Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS) launched in 2002, the National Accountability Ordinance of 1999 (amended 2002) and the National Accountability Bureau - the agency charged with the implementation and overall coordination of the NACS and the Ordinance. A general discussion on these is out of the scope of this U4 answer (there is a bulk of information on these general reform efforts widely available and some good resources are listed in Part III of this answer).
In this section, reform initiatives in some of the specific sectors (perceived to be most affected by corruption) are listed. Namely, efforts in areas of police and law enforcement, judiciary and legal profession and public procurement are discussed. The second section of Part II lists some reform initiatives in other areas.
1. Reforms in sectors rated to be amongst those most affected by corruption
Police and law enforcement
Corruption in the police and law enforcement is perceived to be pervasive - creating a culture of lawlessness and lack of credibility and trust in authorities. The police and law enforcement appointments are often politicised and full of conflict of interest. Criminals and rent-seeking and extortionist authorities are often the sole beneficiaries of the game.
Police reforms were instituted about two and a half years ago by President Musharraf but, according to certain expert voices, have been significantly watered down by the elected government, which still sees political patronage of police officers as important. However, a system of recruitment of better quality and standards is being implemented with improvements in areas of professional training, competence development and remuneration. A great deal remains to be done to implement full police reforms including the establishment of public safety commissions and an effective independent police complaints authority.
It is hoped that the reorganisation outlined by the new Police Order of 2002 and the Police Complaints department will improve the functions of the police and provide relief to the citizens. Reportedly, one of the first steps taken in the reorganization has been the separation of the police force into various branches, divisions, bureaus and sections. It is intended to help improve the efficiency but in fact may lead to more corruption and less efficiency due to non-cooperation or lack of coordination. The Police Order of 2002 has also outlined a format for setting up district Public Safety Commissions (PSC). The functions of such commissions will inter alia include investigations of complaints on excesses and neglect against police officers and encourage greater police-public participation. The PSCs are to be set up within the Federal and Provincial Government and the District and Town Local Governments. There shall also be a National Public Safety Commission. Further, the Order makes provisions for setting up of federal and provincial police complaints authorities for enquiring into serious complaints against the members of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies. Other measures provided for by the Order include the establishment of the Criminal Justice Coordination committee, to work on the improvement of the system as a whole and promote good practices, and of the National Police Management Board, to work on overall technical and human resource capacity building within the Police.
Judiciary and legal profession
There is widespread lack of public confidence in the institutional legitimacy of the justice system. Access to justice and the rule of law are undermined by corruption and are under a threat. Alongside the corrupt judiciary is the legal profession with low ethics of lawyers and poor controls of the bodies (such as the Pakistan Bar Council) responsible for maintaining the high standards that should be required of it.
Reform efforts have included:
a) Access to Justice Programme
The Asian Development Bank (ADB) has in 2001 approved Access to Justice Programme loans totalling US$ 350 million due for completion towards the end of 2004 with Pakistan's Ministry of Law, Justice, Human Rights and Parliamentary Affairs (MOL) as the Executing Agency hosting the programme management unit (PMU). The Programme is built around five inter-related governance objectives: (i) providing a legal basis for judicial, policy, and administrative reforms; (ii) improving the efficiency, timeliness, and effectiveness in judicial and police services; (iii) supporting greater equity and accessibility in justice services for the vulnerable poor; (iv) improving predictability and consistency between fiscal and human resource allocation and the mandates of reformed judicial and police institutions at the federal, provincial and local government levels; and (v) ensuring greater transparency and accountability in the performance of the judiciary, the police and administrative justice institutions.
Further links can be found at:
There are mixed signals about the success of the reforms. It has been voiced that the efforts are perceived to be lacking tangible outcomes and that there have been some challenges in terms of the project implementation itself (sources: NIS country study and an independent expert).
b) Supreme Judicial Council
Efforts are underway to activate the Supreme Judicial Council through international experts working with the Attorney General, the Chief Justice and the President's office.
For further information contact Ms. Shazadi Beg, involved in international consultancy in Pakistan, at firstname.lastname@example.org.
c) Accountability Courts
In 1999, following the coup, Accountability Courts (lapsed as of 1994) have been once again set up throughout the country to decide cases under the amended National Accountability Bureau Ordinance. These Accountability Courts were established for speedy disposal of cases involving corruption and corrupt practices, misuse, abuse of power, misappropriation of property, kickbacks, commissions and the matters connected and ancillary or incidental thereto. The Accountability Courts have so far announced judgments in several high profile corruption cases. Criticism with regards to selective accountability and political motives has been voiced in terms of the courts on a number of occasions, while the NAB and some others have been counter-arguing in defence of the integrity of the practices.
Public sector procurement and contracting
There have been major concerns in this area. There is large-scale corruption in procurement and contracting affecting government and development aid funded programmes, public works, etc. Some of the systemic weaknesses have included the lack of a standardised procurement regime (sets of clear, transparent rules and legislation) along with absence of repository of procurement expertise in the government. Grounds and opportunities for corruption are provided at every stage of the procurement process (from preparation to tender, bid evaluation, negotiations, and contracting).
Some of the reform efforts include:
a) Establishment of a public procurement regulatory authority
For years, several agencies and groups have been recommending the establishment of a single regulatory authority for public procurement, such as the WB in its Country Procurement Assessment report of 1997, as well as TI during its country mission in 2002. In June 2002, the PPRA was promulgated by the President for regulating procurement of goods, services and works in the public sector and for matters connected therewith or ancillary thereto; and extended to the whole of Pakistan. The PPRA, which comprises the Secretary, Finance Division (chair), and the Secretaries of Ministry of Industries and Production, Defence Production Division, Ministry of Water and Power, Ministry of Housing and Works, Ministry of Communications and three members from private sector nominated by the Federal Government, can take such measures and exercise such powers as may be necessary for improving governance, management, transparency, accountability and quality of public procurement of goods, services and works in the public sector. It may monitor application of the laws and procedures; recommend revisions in or formulation of new laws, rules and policies in respect of or related to public procurement; make regulations and lay down codes of ethics and procedures for public procurement, inspection or quality of goods, services and works; monitor public procurement practices and make recommendations to improve governance, transparency, accountability and quality of public procurement; monitor overall performance of procuring agencies and make recommendations for improvements in their institutional set up and other.
Some reports (such as NACS related sources) suggest that the agency, however, has not been properly staffed and needs capacity building if it is to perform the intended functions.
b) Resolution related to procurement standards
In 2002, the National Accountability Bureau as a part of its study in preparing the NACS organised an international workshop, resulting in the stakeholders adopting a resolution related to ensuring transparency in Public Procurement in Pakistan. This resolution was incorporated in the NACS report and was approved by the Ministerial Cabinet and the President of Pakistan in October 2002. Amongst others, the recommendations provide that:
the Standard Procedures for Procurement of Works, Goods and Consultants should be revised by the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority. Either the World Bank or PEC by-laws should be uniformly implemented in all government and semi government departments till such time the PPRA prepares its own Guidelines;
to ensure transparency and public participation, the Transparency International-Pakistan tool 'Integrity Pact" should be made an integral part of all tenders;
for every new project, public hearings should be made mandatory for scrutiny of necessity of the project and for the environmental assessment, prior to concept clearance approval;
evaluation Committees for Pre-qualification and Award of Contracts must include at least two departmental members, and a minimum of three independent experts, (One each from the Pakistan Engineering Council, Institute of Chartered Accountants and FPCCI), and others.
c) Integrity pacts
An important part of the recommendations of the NACS is the incorporation of the TI Integrity Pacts in all contracts for goods and services where the estimated cost of the project is over Rupees 5 million for consultancy and over Rupees 50 million for Construction Contracts. This has been a major breakthrough in the efforts of TI-Pakistan whereby all major contracts will not only provide for the "Integrity Pact" but also include all other recommendations, which have been put out in the NACS Document (outlined above). An example of the Integrity Pact in use is to be found in the Greater Karachi Water Supply Scheme (KIII Project) project. An integrity pact, with a formal no-bribery commitment, was signed by KWSB, consultant bidders and TI Pakistan. It resulted in a successful bid of Rs 62 million ($1.04m) against the reserved fees of Rs 249m ($4.2m). The project adopted the least costly selection method. The bidding process was monitored by Transparency International- Pakistan to ensure it is clean and transparent. In the event of a breach of the Integrity Pact, sanctions come into force against the bidders and officials, including liability for damages, and blacklisting from future tenders. The procurement process is to be followed by monitoring of the contract by civil society, specifically TI Pakistan. The Karachi government had expressed plans to apply the same transparent process to other projects.
2. Reform initiatives in other areas
While, as mentioned above, detailing all general reform efforts in Pakistan over the last few years is out of the scope of this U4 answer, below are summaries of reform efforts in some additional sectors and areas that might be of interest for the purposes of this query. The listing is by no means exhaustive; there are other general reforms and we thus recommend to consult the further resources listed in Part III, in addition to this U4 answer.
Public Service: Efforts are under way on the part of the government to reform the Federal and Provincial Public service commissions, particularly with regards to capacity and competence building. Further, the World Bank has approved a US$55 million IDA credit in May 2004 for Public Sector Capacity Building Projects that will fund the training and professional development of over 500 public servants, enhancing the capacity in key ministries/agencies which are in the forefront of designing, implementing and monitoring policy reform. It will also aim to strengthen some key regulatory agencies, specifically NEPRA (National Electric Power Regulatory Authority), OGRA (Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority) and PTA (Pakistan Telecommunication Authority).
Public sector financial management: It is suggested that some of the weaknesses may be addressed by the government's Project to Improve Financial Reporting and Auditing (PIFRA). The World Bank has carried out a country Financial Accountability Assessment in December 2003 (the report is available on WB Pakistan's website at www.worldbank.org.pk or can be emailed by the U4 helpdesk upon request). Further, the ADB has approved a US$ 204 mln loan (part of a wider sequence) to support the Government of Punjab. Among other objectives, the programme aims to improve the effectiveness and accountability of financial management by bringing in transparent and user-friendly budgets and accounts, and financial and procurement systems (further details can be found on ADB website at http://www.adb.org/Documents/News/2003/nr2003175.asp).
Financial oversight bodies: The Supreme Audit Institution of the country (the Auditor General's office) is trying to reform itself by following international best practices, such as those of the International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI), as part of its reform agenda. It has been noted that there seems to be some progress in reorganizing the department with a view to adopting modern techniques of audit and reporting formats. It has initiated a capacity building program under the project to improve Financial Reporting and Auditing (PIFRA). Some of the other reform efforts include the design of diagnostic tools, such as a "Financial Government Rating Index (FGRI)" and an "Internal Quality Rating (IQR) for its departments, etc.
Public Accounts Committee: the PAC was for a number of years operating as an ad-hoc body in need of serious reform efforts. In December of 2003, a Standing Committee on Public Accounts was finally established comprising about 18 members including the present Minister for Finance (ex-officio).
Independent Anti-Corruption Agencies: the Government of Pakistan has undertaken a number of steps to strengthen the Anti-Corruption Agencies, and has especially concentrated on the National Accountability Bureau for its reforms. The reforms include the creation of NAB as the sole Anti Corruption Agency at the Federal level; adding the functions of prevention through research and monitoring and public awareness and coalition building with civil society to NAB's mandate; provisions on appointments of ACAs (from the elected opposition members) and security of tenure of key office bearers of the ACA and others. Further reforms and restructuring are in the process.
Local Government: the Devolution programme (forming part of the local government plan built around decentralization of administrative authority, de-concentration of management functions, diffusion of the power-authority nexus, and distribution of resources to the district level) of handing over local governance to the local levels and the people is deemed to be progressing satisfactory. The Devolution programme is coordinated by the National Reconstruction Bureau. Some survey tools (mentioned in Part I of this U4 answer) have been developed in cooperation with CIET International to measure progress and the impact of the process on public service delivery at local levels.
Civil society and public participation: It has been noted that civil society and non-governmental organisations are being engaged in government's committees, task forces and other advisory and oversight roles. So, for example, the local government is now required to establish various bodies that are to act as "watchdogs" and contribute inter alia towards the fight against corruption. These are to be set up in each town where citizens can take part in the direct monitoring of the Police, Judiciary, the District Government and others. These include the district Public Safety Commission to prevent unlawful or motivated use of police by the District Nazim; a Police Complaints Authority which will address serious complaints against police; Citizens Community Boards (comprising of civil society representatives) for energizing the community for development and improvement in service delivery through voluntary and self help initiatives as well as for carrying out citizen monitoring of the local government; local Ombudsman schemes and other bodies.
Freedom of Information and Media: Several ordinances have been promulgated in 2002, including the Freedom of Information Ordinance, the Press Council of Pakistan Ordinance and others. While this legislation has scope for major improvements, it is a reasonable first step to build on.
semirza last edited by
Instead of copy pasting lengthy whole articles, some words of your own would be very much appreciated.
haroonyahya last edited by
if i as a citizen charge on anybody claim here anyone i against him, therefore i article paste here with proof articles belongs to researcher and authentic no body can reject, instead of my own words i try to write truth
as in this topic i want to say whole 18 cror pakistani are curupted and i challenge to debate with any one on this my word but many charges on me by readers after i say 18 cror pakistani including me crupted.
i wanted to ask if we the so called middle class have any share in this responsibility or this solely falls on the shoulders of, rulers, capitalists, rich only?
shimatoree last edited by
The middle class is just a less powerful model of the rich and so are the poor.
This is the total failure of the role of religion in the social milieu.and to think that there still people promoting something which has failed to create a just and honest society in 1400 years is mind boggling to say the least.
In Pakistan everyone is out to enrich and empower themselves.
Utter failure is the state of affairs.
I happened to spend the last three days in a small village in Southern Punjab. Now I am surprised more people do not commit suicide. The poverty I witnessed is mind-boggling. I saw many a skeletons walking around. I say three year olds no bigger than the day they were born. I saw a young girl so weak that at the onset of her first period double over and fall, with her feet and hands now twisted at her ankles and wrists (her parents told me they took her to the doctor who told them she is in that state due to malnutrition and would be fine if fed (btw the doctor took their last Rs 250 as fees). Of course there are hundreds of such cases there alone, and I am sure the same is true is most villages and towns.
shafiq12 last edited by
This is so called democracy. One side is so rich and other side a dark dream.
Man made system can't benefit human
ضمير مغرب ہے تاجرانہ، ضمير مشرق ہے راہبانہ
وہاں دگرگوں ہے لحظہ لحظہ، يہاں بدلتا نہيں زمانہ
not sure how religion is being blamed while all the power rests at the hands of international capitalists & their cronies.
may be out of frustration one blames religion because he sees or thinks that we are experiencing european dark ages, that is a common misconception for those who are impressed with european model, but they miss that while europe was in dark ages muslims were in golden ages.
how people are dying of hunger while our fields produce so much crops that they go in surplus, so much energy reserves but people live in darkness, so much gold/copper mines but people are poor
so let us put the onus where it belongs and stop making illogical conclusions.
Yes, I must mention that besides being a farming village, this village has a couple of huge flood relief camps. Interestingly it only feeds those affected by the floods (or those who can pass themselves off as ones). Of course the "smart" ones among the village residents have already stocked up their houses with enough food supplies to last a year from the relief supplies that came in (this village itself was not affected by the floods so a lot of people went to near by places that were and pretended to be flood victims). A lot of neighborhoods were still empty and I was told these people were away pretending to be flood victims and awaiting their Watan cards so they can also get Rs 20,000 in cash (and Rs. 100,000 that is promised later). One told me the patwaris are charging upto Rs. 5000 per card so a lot of the poor affecties who are unable to raise that huge amount are not getting it. Of course the patwaris are also not bothered about giving it to those affected. Who so ever brings the "fees" is getting it instead. The man was also worried about the fees he'll have to pay when he goes to collect the card (that Rs. 5000 only covers registering you as a flood-affectee)
sorry nota, didn't mean to overwrite your post above, but that post also brought another post at forefront that i thought to comment about first, now i am going to comment about your post above.
how different is attitude of that doctor who charged Rs. 250 from a poor family than to the people here? i mean how many of us here take responsibility of current bad situation? none!
just like we we here are busy with our professional career and think that x, y, z are responsible for the mess same is with the doctor who charged his fees, so how different is that doctor from any of us here?
by the way i didn't mean 'rich' by doctors, engineers or professionals working all their life earning/saving wages, i meant the so called 20+ families in Pakistan who control things-
I think we should look beyond the old "20+ families" as the list has grown (names like Zardari, Sharifs, Chaudhries, etc. are certainly as rich, if not more so; of course that is not to exclude the "20+" as they are still very much around).
"how different is attitude of that doctor who charged Rs. 250 from a poor family than to the people here?"
Not much. In fact I found out about the plight of that family from the employer of that guy. Did he help them any more? No. Did they think about increasing the pay of the only bread-earner from the Rs. 1500? No! And I am taling God-fearing, five-time praying folk...