A nice Propasal by CJ;(Using Mosques for Polling)



  • .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .



  • Who is CHief Justice to tell the criteria of winning election only if a candidate gain 50% votes?

    This is none of their task. It is up to assemblies or election commission.

    CJ kee lallchee nazrein election commission pay lagee hein aur woh oss pay qabza karnaa chahta hai.



  • I cant believe what these justices said in the proceedings. It sounds more like a political talk show.

    CJ judiciary koo barbaad karr kay choray gaa.



  • Ask him to come out and try for a councilor from Quetta

    Lag pata jaiay ga



  • iss ko apni auqaat pata hai iss liyay Musharraf se Prime Minister bannay kee bheek mangta rehta thaa.



  • @bsobaid and Anwar Kamal;

    Had not you both seen that whole nation was behind him to get restored?Do'nt blame without any proofs.He is not a political personality.He has given no wrong judgement so far.Seems you people are angry over his judgements in rental power case,NRO case,Drugs case,Haj scandal and so on?



  • "He is not a political personality"

    Yes, he is not supposed to be a political personality but he is acting like one.



  • It can be your personal opinion.But he is quite true and good in judgements.Do'nt go with the remarks which are untruely spread by media.Go with his judgements.We should support and strengthen this judiciary than to politicise them to follow Mushi or Zardari agendas.



  • Nation was not behind a PCO judge of the past .

    Nation was behind him when he stood alone against establishment .

    Now he has gone back to his 2002 position .

    Iam sorry for my support for him in 2007 now .

    He is not different

    We thought ,he is fighting for principles .

    He was fighting for his job .



  • Agree with Kam.



  • @Anwar Kamal;

    Your commenst are quite illogical my friend.Do'nt blame CJ.He can only give the judgement!The rest lies with the Govt,establishment and those who elected this corrupt Govt.Support the judiciary if you wish to see the justice implemented otherwise keep blaming like Mushi and PPP corrupt team is doing.However what do you expect?



  • @Zaheer,

    CJ has politicized the position. How can he gives such biased remarks such as MQM aam aadmi kee khidmat karr rahee hai or pak fouj aur jurnails kee baree qurbaniaa hein etc?



  • He is not giving decisions

    He is commenting like a compare of a Tv Talk Show .

    He has no right to promote his new favorites .

    There are two threads here on this page about his comments .



  • افتخار چوہدری سے بڑا بے وقوف میں نے زندگی میں نہیں دیکھا ہے

    جتنی مسجدیں غیر محفوظ ہیں اور جتنی دہشتگردی مساجد میں ہوتی ہے کہیں اور نہیں ہوتی - کیا افتخار چوہدری مساجد کے محفوظ ہونے کی زمہ داری لیتے ہیں؟

    جو انصاف کے چمپیئن سالے ملکی دولت لوٹ کر سوئس اکانٹس میں رکھنے والوں اور عدالتوں کے فیصلوں کا کھلے عام تمسخر اڑانے والوں کو ہاتھ نہیں ڈال سکتے اور فوجیوں کی ایک ٹیلی فون کال پر ڈھیر ہو جاتے ہیں وہ عوام اور مساجد کو دہشتگردوں سے محفوظ کیسے بنا سکتے ہیں؟



  • While the idea of winning with 50+ percent of vote is purely a democratic, it should have come directly from the democrats. Since the politicians are not going to act on things which do not favor them, it should be discussed on Pakistani media. That is exactly what CJ's statement spawned. Each party and politician should be asked about their opinion on it.

    The following constitutional improvements - need of the time.

    1- Runoff election if no candidate wins majority (+50%)

    2- Ways so that super majority of public should be able to get rid of a 2nd (time) Zardari.

    3- Head of the state immunity against prosecution should be in the boundary of actions for the execution of responsibilities during the term.

    4- Term limits

    5- Filibuster to force majority to compromise. (and also to encourage the perennial mute parliamentarians to speak in the houses)

    6- Ways to curb unopposed elections.

    7- Direct elections of the Senate.



  • koi iss duffer CJ se poochay kiaa auratein masjid mein jaanay dee jaein gee? kiaa hindu aur massehi ko masjid mein ghusnay kee ijaazat milay gee? kiaa imam bargah ko bhi election booth banaoo g ay? wahan sunni jaein g ay?

    Such a duffer and why is he giving these suggestion anyways? This is not his mandate.



  • اکثر جمہوری ملکوں میں یہ طریق کار اختیار کیا جاتا ہے کہ اگر کوئی امیدوار کل ڈالے گئے ووٹوں کا پچاس فیصد نہ لے سکے تو اس سیٹ پر دوبارہ انتخاب ہوتا ہے اور اس انتخاب میں صرف پہلے اور دوسرے نمبر پر آنے والے امیدواروں کو ہی حصہ لینے کی اجازت ہوتی ہے. اس طرح انتخاب جیتنے والا اپنے علاقے کا حقیقی نمایندہ ہوتا ہے

    کینیڈا کے نیٹیو لوگ اپنے نمایندے اسی طریقہ انتخاب سے منتخب کرتے ہیں



  • thats fair Bawa..my problem is why is CJ making such remarks? This is not his business and he is clearly stepping out of his mandate.

    He has shown clear indication in the past that he wants to take over election commission of Pakistan. He is power and fame hungry and becoming a qabza group.



  • @ bsobaid

    آپکی بات سے اتفاق کرتا ہوں کہ

    ہر ادارے کو اپنی آئینی حدود میں رہ کر کام کرنا چاہئیے

    جو کام ججز کے کرنے والے ہیں وہ کرنے کی ان میں جرات نہیں ھے

    سپریم کورٹ کی کاروائی سنیں تو ایسا لگتا ہے کہ سپریم کورٹ میں مولا جٹ شرطیہ نئے پرنٹوں کے ساتھ چل رہی ہے

    اندر جج مولا جٹ کے ڈائیلاگ بول رہے ہوتے ہیں اور باہر آ کر اور ٹی وی ٹاک شوز میں مجرم اور انکے وکیل نوری نت کے ڈائیلاگ بولتے ہیں

    جہاں تک امیدواروں کے ووٹوں کے تناسب کا تعلق ہے تو آئیں میں ترمیم کرکے اس بات کو یقینی بنانا چاہئیے کہ ہر ایم این اے اور ایم پی اے ہر حلقے کی اکثریت کا صحیح نمایندہ ہونا چاہئیے

    صدر، سینیٹ کے ارکان اور مخصوس نششتوں پر لوگ بھی براہ راست عوام کے ووٹوں سے منتخب ہونے چاہئیے کیونکہ ان سب سیٹوں پر بولی لگتی ہے. اس سے یہ چور ڈاکو براہ راست عوام کے شکنجے میں سے گزریں گے اور عوام کا خیال رکھیں گے



  • Supreme court can only judge,how is going to function properly if the administration is not obeying its commands.Judges of the Supreme court do not hold weapon neither they are some mercenaries.Your blames on supreme court are mostly baseless.Though supreme court has constitutional right to command army chief to fulfill its orders,and has also right to announce an emergency state in the country but doing so will like burning its own boats.In the first time of our country's history supreme court is working without any political pressure or pressure from army.Supreme court realized its real strength after the civilian long march,and it will take a long time for them to realize their real authority.Same is happening with all the constitutional departments.Let them work freely and the will become better with time.

    The main point of this proposal is an increased turnout.Despite of our religious demise,there is still a good number of people in the mosques.There are thousands of mosques in every city.They can serve this purpose very well.And in Islam there is no prohibition for a non Muslim in entering the mosque.Non Muslim delegation always came to meet The Holy Prophet in Masjid Nabvi.That was also the center of Islamic state of Madina at the time.And voting for the Caliph was always done in the mosques mainly after Namaz Jumaah,not just during the reign of first four Caliphs but until the end of Caliphate.

    And it is just a proposal then.CJ did not say that they must do that.He has just suggested,that it can be helpful.And its surely debatable.


Log in to reply
 

Looks like your connection to Discuss was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.