3 - Questions from Malik Riaz to CJ Iftikhar Chaudhry



  • آج کے کیپیٹل ٹاک میں شروع میں ایک ایسی بات کہتا ہے جس سے ہماری غیرت بریگیڈ کی اعلیٰ اخلاقی اقدار انتہائی نمایاں ہو کر نظر آتی ہیں۔۔۔۔۔۔

    ;-) :-) ;-)

    ویسے کیا کسی کو پتا ہے کہ اٹارنی جنرل عرفان قادر نے کون سا فحش اشارہ کیا تھا ؟ مڈل فنگر ؟



  • Sheep sahab...kiaa baat hoee thee?? bata dein hum ko bhi..



  • Someone just tweeted this piece:

    خودی کو کر بلند اتنا کہ ، ہر پروگرام سے پہلے ملک ریاض خود پوچھے بتا بنگلہ ادھر لے گا یا دبئی میں



  • عبید صاحب۔۔۔۔۔۔

    شروع کے چار منٹ ہی دیکھ لیں۔۔۔۔۔۔

    :-) ;-) :-)



  • chalo 4 minutes I can watch...



  • ohh..abhi upload nahi hoaa hai..will try again later.





  • Sheep, this is highly concerning.

    If Attorney General did something like this then he should be immediately fired. Attorney GEneral's confidence shows government is thinking CJ is in trouble and has been trapped. This is a dangerous thinking,

    Baaqi Hamadd Mirr kee bakwas was a torture.



  • کچھ بھی کر لو اصل ڈان چودھری پھر بھی بچ نکلے گا

    Cj sucha hai aur such ki jeet hotee hai. while, malik tere tarhan jhota aur makaar hai.

    Cj kai saath missing persons ki duain hain, malik badmash kai saath musharaf ki baqiyaat hai



  • عبید صاحب۔۔۔۔۔۔

    لگتا ہے آپ نے حامد میر کی گگلی کو نظرانداز کردیا۔۔۔۔۔۔ حامد میر نے جب عبدالقادر گیلانی کے پروگرام کے درمیان فون کرنے کا ذکر کیا تو پھر یہ جملہ کہا کہ وہ(اینکر) براہِ راست ہدایات وزیرِ اعظم ہاؤس سے لے رہا تھا۔۔۔۔۔۔

    اب کوئی اعلیٰ اخلاقی اقدار کے حامل حضرات سے پوچھے کہ اگر ارسلان افتخار پر کوئی الزام لگتا ہے تو یہ کہتے ہیں کہ اگر اس میں سچائی بھی ہے تو یہ ارسلان افتخار کا ذاتی فعل ہے اور چیف جسٹس یا سپریم کورٹ اس میں شامل نہیں ہے۔۔۔۔۔۔ لیکن دوسری طرف یہی اعلیٰ اخلاقی کردار کے حامل لوگ اگر عبدالقادر گیلانی کے حوالے سے بات کرتے ہیں تو اس کو وزیرِ اعظم ہاؤس سے جوڑ دیتے ہیں۔۔۔۔۔۔

    میں یہ نہیں کہہ رہا کہ وزیرِ اعظم، صدر، پیپلز پارٹی لازماً اس معاملے کے پیچھے نہیں ہے۔۔۔۔۔۔ ہوسکتا ہے ہو ہوسکتا ہے نہ ہوں۔۔۔۔۔۔ اس پر واقعاتی شواہد کی بنیاد پر اندازہ لگایا جاسکتا ہے یا اگر کسی کے پاس کوئی ٹھوس ثبوت ہوں۔۔۔۔۔۔ لیکن وہ کریں تو ایمان کا اونچا درجہ ہے اور میں کروں تو سالا کریکٹر ڈھیلا ہے۔۔۔۔۔۔

    ویسے کسی صاحب نے کسی اینکر یا صحافی کے منہ سے یہ سنا کہ ارسلان افتخار کے مبینہ رشوت لینے کے معاملے میں سپریم کورٹ ملوث ہے ؟؟؟ اگر سُنا ہو تو مجھے ضرور مطلع کیجئے گا۔۔۔۔۔۔

    ;-) :-) ;-)



  • @Shirazi

    "@Sipahi

    Based on what you agree are the facts, even in the country of your allegiance no person will be convicted.

    
    Are you kidding me? Illinois Gov. Rod Ballgovich recently convicted for trying to get money out of Barak Obama's Senate seat. Here we have paper trail of 350M extortion and you are saying it's not enough to convict? "
    
    Your credibility is going south on a daily basis.
    
    First of all against Rod-Blagojevich there were numerous evidences including wire tapping evidence of him selling Illinios Senate seat as well as him buying Hundreds of thousand of dollars for his compaign in return for making son of Jesse Jackson as senator, promising funding, etc.  
    
    He was convicted on 17 counts.  
    
    In case of CJ, you have zero evidence at this time.
    
    http://winnetka.suntimes.com/news/6117324-418/jury-reaches-verdict-in-rod-blagojevich-case.html
    
    Also Tycoon Riaz has only submitted evidence less than 5% of 350 Million Rupees. Rest of the money, he has not shown any evidence. You are again wrong.


  • If you want to talk, please read the SC report. Stop counting on what is "Blown in Hot Air".

    http://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/web/user_files/File/S.M.C.5of2012dt14-6-2012.pdf

    18. Just to illustrate, prima facie, the absence of professional thoroughness and

    apparent lack of due diligence, let us briefly record here an interesting aspect of the

    documentary “evidence” filed by Malik Riaz with his Concise Statement which we have

    noticed through a cursory glance over these papers. The documents attached with the

    Concise Statement relate only to 4.5% of the total money allegedly spent on behalf of

    Malik Riaz. The rest remains unaccounted for. This is because the total alleged amount

    spent as illegal gratification is almost Rs. 342.5 million or around 34 crore Rupees. This

    spending is alleged to have been done by two distinct means: one, in the form of

    facilitation during the ‘foreign trips’, i.e. paying for tickets, accommodation, food and

    entertainment; second, by way of ‘cash transfers’. It is the second kind of spending i.e.

    SMC 5 of 2012 11

    cash transfers which are alleged to comprise the largest chunk of the alleged bribes. So

    the three foreign trips in aggregate come to Rs. 15.5 million (8.9 + 0.7 + 5.9) or around 1.6

    crore; the rest, a staggering sum of Rs. 327 million or 32.7 crore is supposed to have been

    transferred as cash, i.e. currency notes of unspecified denomination. The documents

    which have been attached to the Concise Statement only deal with the foreign trips

    component of the alleged bribes. For the alleged cash transfers, no evidence at all (not

    even a bare affidavit of Salman Ali Khan) has been provided. Even the dates of such

    cash transfers or their location have not been indicated. These transfers are alleged to

    have taken place in four installments. The largest such installment is said to have been

    Rs. 157 million, i.e. 15.7 crore. By any standards, that is a lot of money for anyone to be

    giving or receiving in the form of hard cash. It is not impossible. But it does raise some

    suspicion about the veracity of the narrative which any diligent or even rudimentary

    inquiry should have addressed. The fact of the matter is we have seen senior and

    intelligent persons buying into the claim, after seeing “evidence” which admittedly

    pertains to less than 5% of the alleged illegal transactions.



  • Hamid Meer got IK by exposing that IK does not even know that less than 5% of said bribes are backed with receipts.

    Why these leaders don't get background before coming to these programs?

    Naive IK thinks that people like Tycoon Riaz will be honest, if they have Holy Quran in hand.

    Don't we have history of muslims who had Holy Quran on on tips of arrows and though they had memorized Holy Quran they were killing innocent muslims.



  • Professor Sipahi,

    Still waiting for your tycoon theory?



  • @QaiserNadeem

    To get into my class, you need to share your credentials before you can be admitted.

    By the way, since you are overseas Pakistani, you might already know about this famous Tycoon and his exploits in many countries.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18437287



  • @Sheep,

    Yes, I noticed that part and thats what I called Hamad Meer's bakwaas. He was just like a saas exaggerating complains against her bahu in front of her son.

    It was also interesting to note how Hamadd Meer held PM house responsible while before he was calling agencies as responsible.



  • Another reason why CJ cant be held responsible for Arslan's ayyashia

    http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_c2#/video/bestoftv/2012/06/15/pkg-sayah-pakistan-population.cnn