“Zulfikar Ali Bhutto: A recognized Killer of Bengalese.”
“Zulfikar Ali Bhutto: A recognized Killer of Bengalese.”
Crimes of Bhutto Family against their Homeland and Faith.
Bhutto Grand Father.
• Bhutto grand father was a killer of a man after killing that man he disguised himself as a Sikh and disappeared in Punjab.
• Bhutto grand father appeared as a false witness in court against Mr. Baghat Singh who was a great freedom fighter and hero of subcontinent.
• Mr. Shanawaz Bhutto acted as a traitor in 1947 against Nawab of Junagarh and Munader who has announced annexation with Pakistan while Mr. Shanawaz Bhutto helped India in occupying that state.
Bhutto was a chronic alcoholic man(Diary of General Ayoub)and more over , her own daughter Benazir Bhutto has written in her book “Daughter of East” that he used to say that he drinks alcohol and do not drink the blood of people. While he was the main culprit throwing two nations of subcontinent India and Pakistan into bloody wars of 1965 and 1971, in which thousands of innocent civilians and soldiers were cold bloodedly murdered and injured and huge infrastructure of subcontinent was destroyed.
Crisis of 1971:
Politicians of two provinces of Pakistan, Sindh and Pukhtoon Khwa always had played a negative role in the life of Pakistan. In fact the largest genocide of 3.0 million people of Pakistan committed in 1971 in East Pakistan was planned by General Yahya Khan and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. both were belonging from these two provinces. Moreover these two provinces are the main hub of disease of ethnic and hatred base provincial politics.
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was the head of the Pakistan Peoples’ Party (PPP) in 1971. In the general election of 1970, Bhutto won 88 seats in West Pakistan as opposed to Mujib’s 162 seats out of 169. As per the legislation Mujib was supposed to form the government of Pakistan. According to some Pakistani high officials sources, at first president Yahya was more inclined to hand power over to Mujib.
But Bhutto opposed Yahya’s decision. Bhutto represented the influential feudal lords. Pakistani military-feudal axis vehemently opposed the transference of power. They were afraid that Mujib’s democratic policies may adversely affect the existing feudal system of West Pakistan and curb the power of the top civil and military bureaucrats. So their representative Bhutto invited Yahya in the notorious Larkana meeting and together two shrewd jackals conspired to repress the Bengalese with military means and retain the political power in the hands of the West Pakistanis. This theory is plausible because such a brilliant idea is more likely to emanate from the arch Machiavellian: Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Yahya is more given to kill his fellow countrymen to show off his military prowess than formulate a brilliant idea to sort all the problems together: destroy Bangladesh; keep the power in the hands of Bhutto and him; make Niazi and the army the scapegoat of the war in order to divert the attention of the Pakistani people. Tajuddin Ahmed was right to think that Bhutto was the deux ex machina behind the political conspiracy leading to the devastation of Pakistan: “…..Bhutto is responsible for the unprecedented brutality unleashed nationwide. Seating with him is impossible. Tajuddin’s view on Bhutto as described by Rao Forman Ali.
Bhutto manipulated the military monsters (Yahya, Tikka) to secure his power and maintain his vested interest in politics.
Due to lust of power of Mr. Bhutto, Pakistani nation which was the best model in the history of mankind representing universal brother hood between two equal parts of population separated by a distance of thousand miles were separated, it took few months in separation of these two parts, but in future for very long time no country of the world will be able to present such model of Human brotherhood on the map of the world.
All through his political career Bhutto thrived on conspiracy and intrigues. As often the fate of such treacherous politicians is to end up in the hands of the partners in crime, Bhutto was justified to be hanged by his own Frankenstein: General Zia-ul Huq in a murder case registered by one of his own party member Mr. Ahmed Raza Kasuri against killing of his father Nawab Muhammad Khan by Bhutto with the help of government security official, because Mr. Kasuri being an elected member of parliament visited Dhaka for participation in the proceedings of National Assembly while Bhutto was threatening to members of National Assembly that he will break the legs of those members who will go to Dhaka for participation in assembly proceeding. Its mean this chronic alcoholic Bhutto for lust of power has already decided to break each and every relation with East Pakistan. So about 16 attempts were made by Bhutto to kill Mr.Kasuri and in one attempt his father was killed.
Now present criminal rulers are trying to hide their crimes by NRO and by taking the advantage of their rule on country, why they have not made such reference in courts when they were not in the power. All members of PPP including MR. Gillani, Mr. Zardari and Babar Awan are gang of criminals always hiding their crimes by deception and tactics which they are facing in courts of law from Peshawar to Paris.
Biased Lawyers of Bhutto.
Like Mr. Bhutto and Mr. Zardari Biased Lawyers of Bhutto and PPP, are showing naked immoral character, and even are not sparring noble and respectable Judges of courts and even victimizing and showing no mercy for family of deceased Mr. Nawab M.Khan, and are busy in rubbing salt and spices on their wounds and painful memories and in their view being Prime Minister and Political leader Bhutto was having right to kill innocent people extra judicially and he should be given no punishment even when allegation of murder was made by his own party member in the era of his own selected chief of army staff ,in the presence of witness and evidence of his own government officials.
These biased lawyers for making money are trying to sow the seeds of biased provincialism,
These biased lawyers do not saw the biased provincialism of Mr. Bhutto belonging from Sindh who along with General Ayoub belonging from Khyber Pukhtoon Khwa sold the three rivers of Punjab to India.
These biased lawyers do not saw the biased provincialism of Mr. Bhutto belonging from Sind who along with General Ayoub belonging from Khyber Pukhtoon Khwa handed over the 750 square kilometer area of Kashmir to China.
These biased lawyers do not saw the biased provincialism of Mr. Bhutto belonging from Sind who along with General Yahya belonging from Khyber Pukhtoon Khwa started military Operation and genocide in East Pakistan and killed three millions people there and throw away ten million people as refugees towards India without consulting any leader or intellectual from larger provinces of Punjab and East Pakistan.
These biased lawyers do not saw the biased provincialism of Mr. Bhutto belonging from Sind who along with General Yahya belonging from Khyber Pukhtoon Khwa conspired to award death sentence to Mr. Mujib-ur-Rehamn from military court in 1970 who was the sole elected leader of Majority and largest province of East Pakistan,
These biased lawyers do not saw the biased provincialism of Mr. Bhutto belonging from Sind who killed the father of Mr.Ahmed Raza Kasuri belonging from second largest province Punjab because he visited Dhaka in spite of the threat of Bhutto that he will break the legs of those who will visit Dhaka for participation in session of national assembly which was the symbol of unity of Pakistan.
These biased lawyers do not see the biased provincialism of Mr. Zardari belonging from Sind who is killing extra judicially the innocent religious people of FATA.
These biased lawyers do not see the biased provincialism of Mr. Zardari and his ministers and MQM belonging from Sind are busy in target killing of innocent people of Karachi.
These biased lawyers do not see the biased provincialism of Mr. Zardari and his ministers and MQM belonging from Sind who are busy in extortion and victimization of innocent people from ethnic minorities in Karachi and Sindh.
These biased lawyers do not see the biased provincialism of Mr. Zardari and his ministers and MQM belonging from Sind who are busy in imposing culture of 17% ethnic population of Sind on remaining 80% population of Pakistan.
These biased lawyers do not see the biased provincialism of Mr. Zardari and his partner parties PPP,MQM and ANP who are busy in spreading disease of provincialism, ethnocentrism and hatred in Pakistan so that they can obtain votes easily by this easy technique, otherwise these corrupted and polluted criminals of humanity do not have any moral or ethical values and merits .
There is need to start criminal investigation against Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto for genocide of Bengalese and crimes against humanity by United Nations and for compensation of all those killed by Bhutto, , Specially in East Pakistan in past, and Specially victim Mr. Ahmed Raza Kasuri should be compensated for murder of his father by Bhutto and family of Mr. Zahoorul Hassan Bhopali murdered in Karachi by terrorist of Murtaza Bhutto who was also awarded by Benazir Bhutto should also be compensated from property of Mr. Bhutto, and case of hijacking of PIA aeroplane should also be started to penalize the criminal Bhutto family and criminal gang of Peoples Party and at present killing of innocent religious people of FATA by corrupted Zardari using government security forces and resources.
Written by M.AKRAM KHAN.
No reference just blame .... a typical M Akram Khan Niazi's Masterpiece.... reflection of typical "Punjabi Raj". Twisting facts and history.
". Twisting facts and history.
Why don't you present untwisted facts and history?
Most third class attempt on a great leader of Pakistan .
No civilian politician is a killer any way , Not only Bhutto but no one else politician of Pakistan .
Most third class attempt on a great leader of Pakistan
A great traitor of Pakistan and it is a first class fact!
No civilian leaser of Pakistan found traitor in the history .
He was a great leader of his times .
Unless people have unbiased opinion they will never be able to see who committed acts for personal reasons but against the national interests.
He was a great selfish leader of his time to whom self-importance came first before national importance.
People will continue to have personal opinions but personal opinions do not make history.
The same articles were written against Mohammad Ali Jinnah, after the division of India---by Khaksar Party, Majlis-e-Ihraar and other orthodox religious parties like JI, which also declared Mr. Jinnah as Kafir.
The same frustrated mindset is trying in waste with same Qawali and Raga.
I think Bhutto's irony is that he was too smart for his rivals. They were incapable of competing with him. Their baseless propaganda still continues.
It is a fact that Bhutto declared that he will never allow Mujeeb to rule Pakistan.
So only an idiot can say that Bhutto was a supporter of Democracy.
Mujeeb was arrested and death penalty was awarded to him by court of Government of Yahya and Bhutto.
So only an idiot can say that Bhutto was a supporter of human rights of Pakistanies.
Bhutto was only leader who supported Military operation in East Pakistan and he was the foreign Minister of That Government.
So only an idiot can say that Bhutto was not responsible for genocide of Bengalese.
Her own daughter has written that he was an alcoholic so only an another alcoholic can say that he was a great man.
I think some forum members are here just for single point agenda.
I found some members, who never participate in any debate except cursing only one they hate like:
Some speaks ag. Bhutto.
Some speaks ag. Shareef Brothers.
Some speaks ag. Zardari
Some speaks ag. Army
Some speaks ag. PMLN
Some speaks ag. PPP
Some speaks ag. MQM
Some speaks ag. PTI
More than that, some member are very special, you will never see even single post from them any other thread, they can be found only in their own opened thread.
Nice Bitter Truth
Some speaks ag.
Some defend and promote relentlessly...
!!!!کاش ہمیں بھی بھٹو مردود کی شان میں چند قصیدے کہنے کی آزادی ہوتی
یہ دستور زباں بندی ہے کیسا تیرے فورم میں
یہاں تو بات کرنے کو ترستی ہے زباں میری
@ Bitter truth,and Sir what about these facts .-?
ZAB during eight years was fiddling for field marshal Ayub and titled him salahudin Ayoobi.Happily took part in rigging and conspiracy against Mader-e-Milat Miss Fatima Jinnah, helped dictator, Ayub to prolong his dictatorship. He used to call him Daddy.
ZAB sacrificed half of the Pakistan for power.
Benazir sacrificed brother for power.
Zardari sacrificed his wife for power.
In future Bilawal will sacrifice his father for power.
You called a person a ‘Shaheed’ who separated East Pakistan, Bhutto killed Khwaja Rafique, Dr Nazeer Ahmad (of D G Khan), Maulana Shamsuddin, Nawab Mohd Khan, Hayat Khan Sherpao, millions lost life in East Pakistan.
Bhutto, a narcissistic, hedonistic feudal lord whose party is a symbol of family fascism, who in drunkenness of arrogance, booze and mental retardation of “Genius”, got Pakistan divided into two with millions of dead and maimed, destroyed the Pakistani manufacturing infra structures by coming to power and nationalizing the industries in the constant state of drunkenness, ignorance and madness.
I strongly feel, that bringing people, who still idealize Bhutto, the Daddy or the Pinky, the BB, are mentally retreated and insane people, and the good Doctor, should not display the retarded people and use them as a “Human Shields”, props or as “circus freaks”, to make his point or start a rift between these loons, the old and grave worshipping, personality cultist, free loaders and the new criminally insane group of thugs and international killers and thieves. The both are selling dead ideas, dead people and their pictures and graves
[The same frustrated mindset is trying in waste with same Qawali and Raga.]
And you will continue the same out of tune Qawali and Raga Joginder Singh and that will not turn a traitor into a saint.
Have some more pegs and go back to bed.
a) Yes, Bhutto was President and CMLA who ordered the army action .
b) Yes, Bhtuto was ruler of the country who didn't transfer power to elected reprsenttive of masses.
c) Yes, bhutto said "I want bengal not bengalis". If i remember correctly , it was Lt.Gen. TOKKA KHAN.
d) Yes, It was bhutto who used to visit units and ask soldiers about their score.
And Yes Bhutto was the same person who served Ayub Khan's government for 8 years and only when he was sacked he found things wrong with Ayub Khan, Simla Agreement so on and so forth.
Disloyalty was a great quality he posessed. Disloyalty to individuals can be forgiven but disloyalty to the country is unforgiveable.
1. Even Mohammad Ali Jinnah once, was a member of the All India National Congress,
In 1916, he emerged as a Champion of Hindu-Muslim Unity.
2. Most of the Elected Members from the West Pakistan would have been killed by hostile Bengalis after the War of 1971, where even Mujib al Rahman declined to stay under the Islamabad.
"It is a fact that Bhutto declared that he will never allow Mujeeb to rule Pakistan................."
Get your facts straight. Bhutto was out of power from the time he resigned from Ayub Govt after 1965 war until he became President in Dec. 1971. The power was with Yahya and his Generals.
Mujeeb had the majority and it was his job to negotiate with Military Junta and form a Govt. He was sitting in Dhaka like an angry teen ager, issuing provocative statements and doing street agitations, not making any real effort to put together some sort of working coalition that would give some representation to then West Pakistan.
Bhutto was an opposition leader and he was rightly trying to make Mujeeb and the Generals realize that he was a representative of a large section of Pakistan and he should be consulted. However, if Mujeeb and the Generals had agreed to make a Govt without PPP, there was nothing Bhutto could do to stop it. Bhutto knew how democracy works and proved that through his time in power from 1971 to 1977. He persuaded even his arch rivals to sign the 1973 constitution. Even the Generals like Gul Hassan, he dismissed, could not come up with any credible evidence of any wrong doing by Bhutto in his book, although he did bash him plenty to avenge his sacking.
It is ridiculous to say that an opposition politician out of power, without a majority in Parliament, controlled everything and ordered the Generals, the administration, the courts, and what not. If this theory had any bearing, why could he not rescue himself from the shackles of the Generals after he was overthrown in 1977.
Bhutto is long gone. We should stop academic dishonesty. The responsibility for 1971 tragedy lies solely with Generals and Sheikh Mujeeb. Analyze the facts and make some rational conclusions. Even his ardent critics like Altaf Hasan Qureshi who used to cry foul at the top of their voice during Bhutto period have sheepishly retracted their baseless allegations. They don't have the courage to admit that but if you do enough research on their writings, it is very easy to detect their u-turn.
And Who said
"udhar tum idhar hum"