Islamic State ruling: Who can have sex with female slaves
Qarar last edited by
Here are a few excerpts from the article:
Islamic State theologians have issued an extremely detailed ruling on when “owners” of women enslaved by the extremist group can have sex with them, in an apparent bid to curb what they called violations in the treatment of captured females.
Among the religious rulings are bans on a father and son having sex with the same female slave; and the owner of a mother and daughter having sex with both. Joint owners of a female captive are similarly enjoined from intercourse because she is viewed as “part of a joint ownership.”
Far from trying to conceal the practice, Islamic State has boasted about it and established a department of “war spoils” to manage slavery.
Fatwa No. 64, dated Jan. 29, 2015, and issued by Islamic State’s Committee of Research and Fatwas, appears to codify sexual relations between IS fighters and their female captives for the first time, going further than a pamphlet issued by the group in 2014 on how to treat slaves.
“If the owner of a female captive, who has a daughter suitable for intercourse, has sexual relations with the latter, he is not permitted to have intercourse with her mother and she is permanently off limits to him. Should he have intercourse with her mother then he is not permitted to have intercourse with her daughter and she is to be off limits to him.”
The fatwa also instructs owners of female slaves to “show compassion towards her, be kind to her, not humiliate her, and not assign her work she is unable to perform.” An owner should also not sell her to an individual whom he knows will mistreat her.
Shirazi1 last edited by
That shows how out of touch these Mullahs are from reality. The kind of obsolete language they use Owner and Slave. Icing on the cake all they are interested in defining the sexual boundaries. On one hand they taunt Shias for muttah and here in fatwa there is no mention of nikkah - the whole focus is try to avoid incest party.
Qarar last edited by
In Mecca, only a handful embraced Islam after 13 years, but in Mdina, herds and herds join the lashkar, why? It was a promise of booty, women, and sex NOT in afterlife but in this life.
Thomas Friedman of the New York Times once wrote a piece why youngsters feel attraction towards ISIS.
In his own words,
"Some are hardened jihadists, but many are just losers, misfits, adventure seekers and young men who’ve never held power, a job or a girl’s hand and joined ISIS to get all three. I doubt many are serious students of Islam or that offering them a more moderate version would keep them home. If ISIS starts losing, and can’t offer jobs, power or sex, this group will shrink."**
a last edited by
lol.fs,is that it? is that the best u two clowns can come up with?
what a joke?