Ppp - turned into Bhutto/zardari property?



  • read this article by tariq ali.

    ppp has been turned into a joke. the party is the personal property of the bhutto/zardari.

    http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/article3295851.ecep

    My heart bleeds for Pakistan. It deserves better than this grotesque feudal charade

    By Tariq Ali, Pakistan-born writer, broadcaster and commentator

    Published: 31 December 2007

    Six hours before she was executed, Mary, Queen of Scots wrote to her brother-in-law, Henry III of France: "...As for my son, I commend him to you in so far as he deserves, for I cannot answer for him." The year was 1587.

    On 30 December 2007, a conclave of feudal potentates gathered in the home of the slain Benazir Bhutto to hear her last will and testament being read out and its contents subsequently announced to the world media. Where Mary was tentative, her modern-day equivalent left no room for doubt. She could certainly answer for her son.

    A triumvirate consisting of her husband, Asif Zardari (one of the most venal and discredited politicians in the country and still facing corruption charges in three European courts) and two ciphers will run the party till Benazir's 19-year-old son, Bilawal, comes of age. He will then become chairperson-for-life and, no doubt, pass it on to his children. The fact that this is now official does not make it any less grotesque. The Pakistan People's Party is being treated as a family heirloom, a property to be disposed of at the will of its leader.

    Nothing more, nothing less. Poor Pakistan. Poor People's Party supporters. Both deserve better than this disgusting, medieval charade.

    Benazir's last decision was in the same autocratic mode as its predecessors, an approach that would cost her – tragically – her own life. Had she heeded the advice of some party leaders and not agreed to the Washington-brokered deal with Pervez Musharraf or, even later, decided to boycott his parliamentary election she might still have been alive. Her last gift to the country does not augur well for its future.

    How can Western-backed politicians be taken seriously if they treat their party as a fiefdom and their supporters as serfs, while their courtiers abroad mouth sycophantic niceties concerning the young prince and his future.

    That most of the PPP inner circle consists of spineless timeservers leading frustrated and melancholy lives is no excuse. All this could be transformed if inner-party democracy was implemented. There is a tiny layer of incorruptible and principled politicians inside the party, but they have been sidelined. Dynastic politics is a sign of weakness, not strength. Benazir was fond of comparing her family to the Kennedys, but chose to ignore that the Democratic Party, despite an addiction to big money, was not the instrument of any one family.

    The issue of democracy is enormously important in a country that has been governed by the military for over half of its life. Pakistan is not a "failed state" in the sense of the Congo or Rwanda. It is a dysfunctional state and has been in this situation for almost four decades.

    At the heart of this dysfunctionality is the domination by the army and each period of military rule has made things worse. It is this that has prevented political stability and the emergence of stable institutions. Here the US bears direct responsibility, since it has always regarded the military as the only institution it can do business with and, unfortunately, still does so. This is the rock that has focused choppy waters into a headlong torrent.

    The military's weaknesses are well known and have been amply documented. But the politicians are not in a position to cast stones. After all, Mr Musharraf did not pioneer the assault on the judiciary so conveniently overlooked by the US Deputy Secretary of State, John Negroponte, and the Foreign Secretary, David Miliband. The first attack on the Supreme Court was mounted by Nawaz Sharif's goons who physically assaulted judges because they were angered by a decision that ran counter to their master's interests when he was prime minister.

    Some of us had hoped that, with her death, the People's Party might start a new chapter. After all, one of its main leaders, Aitzaz Ahsan, president of the Bar Association, played a heroic role in the popular movement against the dismissal of the chief justice. Mr Ahsan was arrested during the emergency and kept in solitary confinement. He is still under house arrest in Lahore. Had Benazir been capable of thinking beyond family and faction she should have appointed him chairperson pending elections within the party. No such luck.

    The result almost certainly will be a split in the party sooner rather than later. Mr Zardari was loathed by many activists and held responsible for his wife's downfall. Once emotions have subsided, the horror of the succession will hit the many traditional PPP followers except for its most reactionary segment: bandwagon careerists desperate to make a fortune.

    All this could have been avoided, but the deadly angel who guided her when she was alive was, alas, not too concerned with democracy. And now he is in effect leader of the party.

    Meanwhile there is a country in crisis. Having succeeded in saving his own political skin by imposing a state of emergency, Mr Musharraf still lacks legitimacy. Even a rigged election is no longer possible on 8 January despite the stern admonitions of President George Bush and his unconvincing Downing Street adjutant. What is clear is that the official consensus on who killed Benazir is breaking down, except on BBC television. It has now been made public that, when Benazir asked the US for a Karzai-style phalanx of privately contracted former US Marine bodyguards, the suggestion was contemptuously rejected by the Pakistan government, which saw it as a breach of sovereignty.

    Now both Hillary Clinton and Senator Joseph Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, are pinning the convict's badge on Mr Musharraf and not al-Qa'ida for the murder, a sure sign that sections of the US establishment are thinking of dumping the President.

    Their problem is that, with Benazir dead, the only other alternative for them is General Ashraf Kiyani, head of the army. Nawaz Sharif is seen as a Saudi poodle and hence unreliable, though, given the US-Saudi alliance, poor Mr Sharif is puzzled as to why this should be the case. For his part, he is ready to do Washiongton's bidding but would prefer the Saudi King rather than Mr Musharraf to be the imperial message-boy.

    A solution to the crisis is available. This would require Mr Musharraf's replacement by a less contentious figure, an all-party government of unity to prepare the basis for genuine elections within six months, and the reinstatement of the sacked Supreme Court judges to investigate Benazir's murder without fear or favour. It would be a start.

    HAVE YOUR SAY on the assassination of Benazir Bhutto

    Is Tariq Ali right to criticise the 'feudal charade' that seen Benazir Bhutto's son installed as her successor? Let us know what you think.



  • No doubt. Theoretically and logically Mr. Tariq Ali has a point.

    He is a genius Scholar like Salman Rushdie

    But he overlooked, by not mentioning the role of Establishment in Pakistan for the last 60 years to create a cloudy situation in order to damage the image of Political Parties and leaders.

    Under the existing circustances, Bhutto Factor cannot and should not be eliminated, to save PPP from being bursted into 5 or 6 sections like Muslim League.



  • I agree with Javedsheikh completely. We cannot understand Pakistan`s Politics without the context and role of establishment in the country. We have a culture of personal politics then party politics and to keep along that Bhutto family should be given a symbolic role now and actual when necessary.



  • so are we supposed to become the slaves of these people?



  • PPP has always been a family party. So there should be no commotion on Bilawal's appointmant. Interestingly this is the only party in Pakistan that initially had a 'Chairman', then had a 'Chairwoman' and now has a 'Chairboy'.

    But joking aside, no matter how much one may dislike the politics of dynasties, it is the right of PPP workers and voters to choose as their leader whomever they wish to.

    Those of us who do not like this choice always have the option of not voting for PPP.



  • “Democracy is the best revenge” said by the new chairman And co-chairman did buried it right afterwards in the rest of the press conference.

    PPPs chairmanship is their internal matter & their CEC will always select a Bhutto as a paryt chairman unless they break the status quo of traditional politics by dilerving while in house or out of the house.



  • seriously though, there wasnt any more qualified people in the ppp out of their "millions" of workers that could take BB's place?



  • PPP is a purely feudal enterprise. it's not at all a democratic party.

    to those that suggest that this the party's internal matter, well that's what most corrupt and tyrannical regimes say when criticized.

    if you can't even practice democracy at party level how can you champion and promote it national level? the answer you can't.

    The PPP myth is based on lies and deceit and the exploitation of the poor.

    the hundered of thousands bussed in by the feudal machinery of the ppp to cheer and die at the alter of Benazirs arrogance is proof enough of their disdain for the poor. if you need further proof go and look at the plight of the share croppers on theisr jagirs, who can't even feed their children, whilst these parasites gorge themselves on russian caviar and belgian chocolate.



  • rehan you are exactly right.



  • Zardari certainly doesn't have the good repute. He has damaged the PPP and if he has not learnt from his past mistakes he might again damage the party. But I am at least ready to give him the benefit of doubt for this time considering the political situation of Pakistan.



  • lol fahim you are ready to give a convicted corrupt politician the benefit of the doubt about what?

    that he will steer the country in a better direction? pleeease

    he is only in this to pad his retirement fund with money from the pakistani coffers.



  • on top of the billion or so that he will inherit from his wife, benazir

    this is the reason we are here today.

    we always have a one point agenda

    get rid of ayub, yahya, zulfiqar bhutto, zia ul haq, BB,NS,BB,NS

    now musharraf. same one point agenda.

    same lack of planning.

    same lack of alternative.

    same lack of vision.

    this is why we're here.

    we think lets get rid of A, B, C, X, Y, Z

    everything will be ok

    we didnt learn from history did we



  • @Secular

    Do you want lifetime leader? I would prefer institutional strength than individuals. Leaders come govern and leave when their time is up and their popularity rating goes down due to their wrong policy. By the way BB & NS never get full tenure; whereas Ayub, Zia & Mush got double plus terms. Yahya was extension of Ayubs regime. And every time these thugs leave with a catastrophic mess for politicians to clean up. As far as corruption on politicians are concern, I won't debate it. Do you know corruption inside army? it is huge and much bigger than politicians. Their usage of fund never come in to public their accounts never get audited and they are not accountable to anybody. At least we know politicians grabbed funds, do you know how much funds were grabbed by military? US Aid of $10 Billion since 9-11. Lets compare it with budget of Pakistan since 9-11, are they showing those $10 billion in the revenue portion in the budget of Pakistan since 9-11? That means we don't know whats is happening to major portion of money meant for poor people of Pakistan. 2 Million plus heroine addicts in Pakistan, gift from Zia-ul-Haq (So Called Mar-e-Momin Mard-e-Haq).